ANNE GRANT SPEAKS OUT AGAINST THE USE OF "PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME" IN CUSTODY SWITCHING SCAMS IN RHODE ISLAND! THESE VERY SAME SCAMS ARE TAKING PLACE REGULARLY IN CONNECTICUT AS WELL!

In speaking out against an attorney who stands in support of PAS theory, Anne Grant stated the following: 

"Last night I testified before the Judicial Nominating Commission against a lawyer seeking to become a Family Court judge. I am posting that testimony here with linked documents for commissioners, candidates, and the public. (These links do not work from the body of the text, but only from the references given in the footnotes.)

Please notify me, Anne Grant, ParentingProject@verizon.net if you have any concerns or corrections regarding this testimony. Thank you. 

§ 8-16.1-4  Criteria for selection of best qualified nominees. – The commission shall consider, but is not limited to, the following factors in selecting the best qualified nominees: intellect, ability, temperament, impartiality, diligence, experience, maturity, education, publications, and record of public, community, and government service. … The commission shall also consider the candidate's sensitivity to historically disadvantaged classes, and may disqualify any candidate with a demonstrated history of bias towards any of these classes.[i] 

Your criteria for selecting nominees includes impartiality, diligence, publications, and sensitivity to historically disadvantaged classes. Barbara Barrow wrote an article for the Rhode Island Bar Journal that disqualifies her for the bench on those grounds. I am posting this testimony with linked references so you can examine the sources for yourself.

Barbara Barrow’s article, “Parental Alienation Syndrome in Divorce”[ii] is simplistic and ignores factual evidence. What she leaves out is significant. She says that Richard A. Gardner, M.D., introduced “Parental Alienation” in the 1980s. She does not mention these facts:

·      Dr. Gardner was a psychiatrist on a mission to normalize sex between adults and children.[iii]

·      He was a leading lobbyist against mandatory reporting of child sex abuse.[iv]

·      He set up his own publishing company in New Jersey called “Creative Therapeutics.”

·      He published his theories without standards of peer review that are essential to establish scientific claims.

·      He falsely identified himself as a Clinical Professor of Child Psychiatry at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, a claim Columbia denied, asserting he was only a volunteer.[v]

·      Dr. Gardner served as an expert witness in more than 400 custody cases.

·      He committed suicide in 2003.[vi]

Gardner held that children who claim to be sexually abused by fathers should not be believed. He hypothesized that the mothers had alienated, brainwashed, coached, and programmed their children. In one of the last interviews Gardner gave, Garland Wallerasked what a mother should do when her child accuses a father of sexual abuse. Gardner replied the mother should say: “I don't believe you. I am going to beat you for saying that. Don't you ever talk that way again about your father.”[vii]...."

For more of this testimony, please click on the link below:

http://custodyscam.blogspot.com/2015/06/testimony-on-racket-of-parental.html

PLEASE SUPPORT JUSTINA'S LAW!

For an update and call to action regarding Justina's Law which would forbid medical experimentation on foster children, please click on the link below:

https://www.votervoice.net/RMC/Petitions/642/Respond?vvsn=BAAAAAkIAECKAA2Y9HN7FAA

HARTFORD COURANT STORY ON DRUNKEN FATHER SAYS IT ALL!

Today The Hartford Courant published the following brief report:

"WEST HAVEN — A Milford father was arrested Tuesday evening after he was found sleeping on a curb with his 4-year-old next to him in a stroller, police said.

Harry Apuzzo, 52, of Jepsen Drive was charged with breach of peace and risk of injury to a minor, police said.

Officers were called to the area of 764 Campbell Ave. at about 7:10 p.m. When they arrived, they found Apuzzo and witnesses who said they had seen him stumbling several times while pushing the stroller. He then fell asleep on the curb, they said.

Apuzzo had alcohol containers in his possession, police said.

When the officers woke him up, Apuzzo said the child was his daughter and they had been at the beach all day. He smelled of liquor, police said.

The child was taken to a hospital for evaluation for possible dehydration, police said."

The link to this story is below:

http://www.courant.com/breaking-news/hc-west-haven-risk-arrest-0625-20150624-story.html

Upon seeing this article, on a hunch I went to the CT Judicial Branch case lookup and found that Harry Apuzzo and his ex wife were involved in what looks like a fairly high conflict divorce case from 2010 to 2014.  

How is it, do you think, that the Family Court system where this divorce case took place failed to notice that father is an alcoholic and likely to place his daughter at risk of injury?  

Isn't this typical of what battered mothers see happening all the time in family court?  

Abusive fathers who are unsafe with their children, regardless of whether they are drug addicts or alcoholics, regardless of whether they medically neglect their children or place them at risk, still have unfettered access to their children.  

Thus, the situation above, where the father was totally drunk and acting irresponsibly with his little four year old girl is the inevitable outcome of Family Court's attitude that no matter how abusive and irresponsible, fathers can do no wrong.  

As a mother, I am aware that you could bring to court stacks of medical reports, stacks of incident reports showing irrefutable evidence that a father has and will continue to put his children at risk, and no judge will care about this at all, because the Court system is in such a rush to allow fathers full access to their children,  it doesn't care how much harm such fathers perpetrate on their children.  

The bottom line is that these kinds of situations which put children at risk in the hands of irresponsible and dangerous fathers are happening all over the "father friendly" State of Connecticut.  This State and its Judicial System is a disgrace to the nation.

THE COALITION'S LIGHT STILL SHINES! ADAM LAMBERT KILLS IT IN "THE ORIGINAL HIGH" SONG "THE LIGHT"!

HAPPY FATHER'S DAY!

SARAH KNUTSON FORMULATES "DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE" FROM CORRUPT MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONAL EXPERT WITNESSES!

In the course of human events, it periodically proves necessary for oppressed people to dissolve the political ties that connect them with the majority culture. So entrenched are the dominant viewpoints, that repeated appeals to reason and conscience prove futile, whereas harms and grievances mount exponentially. At some point, it becomes clear that the respect, dignity and worth that is a common birthright as human beings will never be freely given.  -  It must simply declared and taken.

Accordingly, we hold these truths to be self-evident:

1. Everyone is created equal in rights and dignity. We are all, without exception, endowed with reason and conscience. Consistent with the rights of others, we are all entitled to create meaning and pursue happiness in our own way.

2. We live in a world where there can be no experts as to subjective matters affecting another person’s life, liberty or pursuit of happiness. To the contrary, practically the only certainties of the human condition are uncertainty, loss and death. Other claims at certainty are at best 'probabilities'  -  which, by their nature, admit exception in individual cases. We therefore reject any claim by those with political, organizational, institutional or family power to pass judgment on the subjective experience of other human beings  (including the meaning of personal thoughts, feelings or actions) under color of law or majority approval.

3. Such substituted judgments are in direct contravention of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, and its spirit. This includes any rules or claimed authority that (1) fail to recognize any and all human beings as endowed with reason and conscience; (2) purport to relieve any person, organization, or community of its obligation to afford everyone, without exception, equal rights and dignity; and (3) privilege some people or groups to treat others as less than full and equal members of the human family.

4. As human beings, we have the right to treat each other first and foremost as members of a human family, and to be treated by others as such. This includes recognizing each other’s shared and equal birthright to all the blessings of liberty, and supporting each other's access to all things necessary for human functioning, growth and development.  This is the right of human beings.  No political, institutional, business, industry or guild interest can legitimately deprive anyone of such rights.   

To this end:

1. We proclaim and reclaim our birthright to respect, dignity, reason, conscience and equal rights on a par with all other members of the human family.

2. We refuse to recognize as valid any exceptions made by any person or entity to these fundamental obligations between human beings.

3. We deem null and void any human law, rule or regulation that violates this fundamental code.

4. We refuse to recognize the legitimacy of human-made rules or hierarchies that seek to substitute their guild, business or group interests for the human regard that is owed by one human being to another. These include the laws, regulations, policies, codes and ethics adopted by legislatures, agencies, corporations, organizations, businesses, institutions, professions – or anyone else who claims the right to make decisions that seek to exempt their members from the fundamental obligations of human beings to regard each other with reason, conscience and in the spirit of human family.

Therefore: In accordance with the intent and spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, and the numerous International Human Rights efforts that have since followed, we hereby liberate ourselves and each other to act in accordance with our human duty and birthright of reason, conscience and equal membership the world family of human beings.

OP-ED LINKS DCF, BILLION DOLLAR LAW FIRM, AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES IN A CONSPIRACY TO EXPAND THE USE OF PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATIONS AMONG CT'S FOSTER CHILDREN!

According to an Op-Ed by Robert Fiddaman in 2011, 

"For some time now, Sheila Matthews has been suspicious about her home state of Connecticut's treatment of its most vulnerable children. As a mother of two children and co-founder of Ablechild, her instincts led her to scrutinize the dubious relationships among Connecticut's Department of Children and Family Services [DCF], the pharmaceutical industry, and a billion dollar law firm that has defended the likes of Pfizer Inc and Merck & Co., among others.

Sheila's investigation has led her on a journey that links a non-profit children's advocacy group, with assets over $15 million [2009], with nationally-renowned mass tort and class action defense law firms, to the Connecticut DCF - an $865 million bureaucracy, as described by the Connecticut Mirror..."

For more on this interesting subject, please click on the link below*:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Billion-Dollar-Drug-Compan-by-ROBERT-FIDDAMAN-110310-185.html

*I am not familiar with the subject matter of this article and so I cannot guarantee its accuracy, however I do think it is important to be informed and if more substantive information comes forward to support these allegations, I will certainly share it with you all.